Sample Legal Ethics Exam Questions

  • Post author:
  • Post category:미분류

Hey, Azadeh, I`m sorry I couldn`t be here this morning, but I`m at Elmwood Hospital. Jeanne Fisher, a former colleague at our clinic who practices alone in town, had a massive stroke over the weekend. Very sad. Either way, there are some things you need to do. First, Mary O`Connor, a former client, does not want to pay our fees and has threatened us with a malpractice lawsuit. We have agreed with them to write off the fees if they waive all claims against us. See my secretary Michael who will show you the correct form, which is pretty easy, but ask Michael if you have any questions. Second, around noon, take the file with our public speeches and go to the Chinese American Women`s Club for lunch and give our speech “How a lawyer can protect you from domestic violence.” Wait until after the speech and see if you can`t attract potential customers. If they are worried about the cost, reassure them that they will not have to pay a penny if we take care of their case. We cover all costs, including medical and other examinations. Third, in our case of Maria Costas, her mother pays us the legal fees, but she is behind schedule. Call them for another payment.

She will want to know what is going on in the case, but we keep telling her that nothing is really happening yet. If necessary, invent something about the delay of the court. Whatever. Or, if you prefer, let Michael call Maria`s mother. I`ll catch up with you after work. We can have dinner and drinks at Happy Jack`s. Provide advice to the lawyer. In this unusual jurisdiction, the only applicable law is the text and commentaries to Rule 3.3 of the ABA Model Rules and the text and commentaries to each Rule expressly referred to in Rule 3.3. Case law, lecture notes, outlines, course materials, articles in the legal media, etc. are considered unnecessary and cannot be cited in your response. You can use common sense and make all the regulatory proposals you want, but the only “law” is the text and commentary of section 3.3 and the text and commentary of any other rule mentioned in that rule.

The MPNA is designed to cover legal ethics to ensure that law students are prepared for the complexities of life as a lawyer. As a result, the examination itself is quite tricky. It`s a lot harder than most people think, so don`t be surprised! 7. In the duties of a lawyer towards clients, is a lawyer allowed to provide legal services to clients who have conflicting interests in the same case or civil cases under Vietnamese law? Under what usual conditions can lawyers from other jurisdictions provide legal services to the parties to the dispute in the same case? Here are the exam questions from my last legal ethics course. All matters concerning the MPRA are divided into 12 categories and are based on the law that governs the ethical conduct of lawyers and judges. Students will also encounter questions outside of this context. These are intended to test the understanding of the rules, principles and regulations accepted in the law. The Model Rules are the ultimate goal of the MPRE and are generally followed at the federal level, so most states require legal practitioners to pass this exam. Students can also expect to be tested in jurisprudence, court rules, and legal advice. After all, the ABA and New York require every client`s consent to the potential conflict. ABA Rule 1.7(b)(4) requires that “each affected client provide written informed consent,” and New York RD 5-105(C) requires the consent of each joint client for “full disclosure of the effects of simultaneous representation and the associated benefits and risks.” What are the benefits for Bonnie and Clyde if you represent both instead of having their own independent lawyer? Likely benefits include: (i) better coordination between Bonnie and Clyde in their lawsuit against Marvin Gardens (p. e.g., avoid discrepancies in their statements about how the accident occurred); (ii) faster planning, as there is less time for lawyers; and (iii) a united front trying to blame Marvin.

The disadvantages (which are largely on Clyde`s side) include: (i) it will be impossible for Clyde to sue Bonnie as long as she is represented by the same lawyer; (ii) it will be difficult for you to investigate Bonnie`s role in the accident; (iii) if a dispute arises for any reason during the performance, Bonnie or Clyde or both may need to hire new counsel, which may delay the action; and (iv) none of the clients will be able to invoke solicitor-client privilege for communications during joint representation, which could adversely affect Bonnie if Clyde later decides to sue her. In addition, a typical benefit of joint representation may be missing. Typically, parties can save on attorney fees and costs by hiring one attorney instead of two, but in contingency fee cases, the attorney typically charges each mutual client a full fee. If this is the case, the savings will be limited to cost savings (for example, one lawyer instead of two lawyers will have to make copies of the relevant documents), and it will not be much. The MPRE is a test best taken as soon as possible, as many regions complete the BAR exam behind it. So make sure you take it early enough to have enough time for the BAR exam. MPRE practical questions help students prepare for this challenging exam. First of all, MPRE is an acronym for Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam.

It is designed to ensure that law students understand the ethical laws that must be followed by lawyers, or the model rules as they are known in the legal world. QUESTION 2: Read the following scenario and answer the relevant questions: (4 points) Finally, remember that the lessons learned under the Professional Liability category do not always apply, as they do not cover all the questions asked at the PRME. That`s why it`s so important to find practical MPRE questions. QUESTION I: Provide answers to the following questions: (4 points) Summary: Prepare for the MPRE part of the bar exam with practical MPRE questions. Lawyers are faced with legal decisions that are not always clear. This exam tests a law student`s ability to make ethical decisions that are not always clear. For example, if you answer 30 questions correctly, you will get a score of 85. In March 2020, the average scale score for the PRMS was 95.8. Students will complete the PRMS on computers in the test facility.

It has 60 multiple-choice questions, but only 50 of them are actually scored. The other 10 are called pre-test questions and students don`t know what they are. One final point: My review issue has been raised in the context of personal injury lawsuits. But the same problems, often even more complex, occur in corporate and commercial contexts. Conflicts lurk everywhere, especially in joint representation or in a lawsuit against a current or former client. Take the time to carefully analyze these conflicts. Otherwise, you could face a disqualification claim that you cannot win. MPRE practical questions are a great way to prepare for this part of the BAR exam, but there are a few additional methods and tips to keep in mind. Representing Bonnie alone probably raises the same issues. She`s unlikely to sue Clyde (unless he tickled her while she was driving or caused Bonnie to crash), but you`ll still have to defend her against Clyde if he sues her. In this case, you have confidential information from Clyde about its violations, and your use of that information could be very detrimental to it. For example, he may have said during the interview, “Everything will be fine.

It hurts a bit, and I`m sure I can still teach music. You have passed the bar exam and specialize in legal ethics. One of your long-time clients, a criminal lawyer, calls you for help and leaves you this voicemail: since it seems rather doubtful that you can pass the “disinterested lawyer” test to represent Bonnie and Clyde at the same time, can you represent Bonnie or Clyde alone? Maybe, but you still have a big problem – both are treated like a former client, meaning you can`t resist either without informed consent. ABA Rule 1.18, which was added to the ABA Model Rules in 2002, addresses this situation. Rule 1.18(a) states: “A person who discusses with a lawyer the possibility of establishing a client-lawyer relationship in relation to a matter is a potential client.” Even if a potential customer has not engaged you, Rule 1.18(b) generally prohibits you from using or disclosing confidential information you have learned from the prospect. In addition, Rule 1.18(c) prohibits you personally from objecting to a potential customer who has not hired you for the same matter if you have “received information from the potential customer that could be significantly detrimental to that person in the matter,” unless the potential customer consents. Here, it`s not clear if you`ve received any information from Bonnie or Clyde that could be “significantly damaging” to them. For example, has Bonnie ever said, “The accident was really my fault”? Did she give any information about Clyde`s injuries? If you only represent Clyde and sue Bonnie (as well as Marvin), this information could be significantly damaging to Bonnie. Nevertheless, Rule 1.18(d) allows another lawyer in your firm to reject Bonnie if she gives informed consent or if you have “taken reasonable steps to avoid receiving more disqualifying information than was reasonably necessary to determine whether you should represent her,” and you will be screened in a timely manner and no portion of the fee will be awarded. The facts do not indicate that you took steps to avoid receiving “disqualifying information” from Bonnie during the first interview.